Prior to browsing this website, please carefully read the disclaimer below. It indicates certain restrictions imposed by regulations regarding the dissemination and use of the information presented regarding the products and services offered by Private Corner.
By clicking on the "I accept" box, you certify that you have read, understood, and agreed to the conditions outlined in this disclaimer, and you confirm that you are recognized as a professional client or equivalent within the meaning of French regulations.
If you are advised by a regulated third party, you must rely on them for any subscriptions.
The information contained on the pages of this site is solely intended to present the expertise of Private Corner in the field of unlisted asset management.
They are not intended to:
- provide an exhaustive presentation of alternative investment funds (hereinafter referred to as "AIFs") managed by Private Corner;
- constitute an offer or solicitation to sell shares or units of any of the AIFs referenced on this site, to anyone in any jurisdiction where such an offer, solicitation, or distribution would be deemed illegal or where the person responsible for such offer or solicitation is not authorized to do so, or to any person to whom such offer or solicitation is prohibited.
Numerous restrictions and eligibility conditions, regulatory or statutory, not described or only briefly mentioned on this site, govern the subscription or acquisition of shares or units in these AIFs, their presentation and distribution methods by intermediaries (depending in particular on the investor's place of residence), eligibility conditions related to the investor (based in particular on their financial knowledge, financial resources, regulated or non-regulated status, variable categorization from one country to another), or the minimum investment amount required by the AIF's documentation.
In general, the AIFs managed by Private Corner are only intended for professional or equivalent investors.
The risks, fees, commissions, and recommended investment horizons for the presented AIFs are detailed in the prospectus/rules of the AIFs, which are made available to the investor before any subscription.
This official documentation is only available from Private Corner or third-party partners expressly authorized or mandated by Private Corner, sometimes exclusively in a given territory and/or a defined investor segment.
The value of your investments in these AIFs and the potential income derived from them may fluctuate, both upward and downward, and are in no way guaranteed. The risk of capital loss is equivalent to the amount invested.
As a professional or equivalent investor, it is your responsibility to know and comply with all applicable legal and regulatory provisions in the relevant territory.
By continuing, I certify that I have read and accepted the content of the above legal information.
Are you a private wealth management professional? To find out about our full range of investment services, please don't hesitate to contact us:
I am contacting Private Corner
In a context characterised by increasingly sophisticated asset allocation strategies, an in-depth understanding of specialised investment vehicles such as feeder funds and funds of funds is essential. Initially reserved for institutional investors, these structures are now popular with savvy private investors. Financial advisors must therefore have a thorough grasp of these concepts in order to respond effectively to their demanding clients.
European regulatory developments, particularly through the UCITS and AIFMD has clarified the environment of these funds and imposed greater transparency. In-depth knowledge of the regulatory and structural specificities now makes it possible to offer private investors investment solutions previously reserved for institutions.
A feeder fund is an investment vehicle that invests at least 85% of its assets in a single fund called a ‘master fund’. Its purpose is to fully replicate the strategy of this master fund. The master fund is often managed by a specialised company with a specific or diversified strategy.
The UCITS V directive requires feeder funds to be fully transparent about their strategy, risks and costs. The ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) specifies the reporting obligations to investors, thus ensuring clear communication on the specific nature of the feeder fund.
The term ‘feeder fund’ comes from the English-speaking world and refers to the concept of a ‘fonds nourricier’ (French for ‘feeder fund’). In practice, ‘fonds nourricier’ and ‘feeder fund’ are therefore generally considered to be synonymous. This equivalence is widely accepted by European regulators and industry professionals.
A fund of funds (FoF) invests exclusively in several different funds, thus creating immediate diversification. Unlike a feeder fund, a fund of funds does not depend on a single master fund, but distributes its assets among several managers and investment strategies.
The main difference between a feeder fund and a fund of funds is their composition. The feeder fund invests entirely in a single master fund, while the fund of funds is made up of several funds.
A feeder fund is characterised by passive management, fully aligned with that of the master fund, since this is its very essence: exposure to a single strategy, selected after a long due diligence process. The principle here is to offer a pure building block to financial advisors so that they can build their clients' portfolios according to their specific needs.
Funds of funds, on the other hand, are made up of a selection of funds according to a defined strategy: this may be a diversified selection that could expose to different types of unlisted assets, for example (private equity, private debt and infrastructure), or it may be a selection of different managers with the same strategy. In this case, we think of a ‘pure’ strategy such as Capital Transmission (LBO). The manager rigorously selects each underlying fund according to the orientation of the fund of funds that he has defined and validates the complementarity between the different funds.
In order to effectively integrate these structures into wealth strategies, several aspects must be rigorously analysed:
For the feeder fund, in-depth analysis of the master fund (performance, management team, ESG criteria).
For the fund of funds, evaluation of the underlying funds (history, real diversification, correlations) where possible.
Systematically check regulatory reporting to avoid any operational or compliance risk.
Clearly identify and communicate to investors the reality of potential indirect costs.
The feeder fund offers private investors privileged access to unlisted funds usually reserved for institutions, while allowing them to benefit from the expert management of the master fund. It is an interesting lever for targeted diversification and access to exclusive strategies. Finally, it is a perfect tool when the Financial Advisor needs to build a tailor-made allocation for his or her wealth management client.
The fund of funds is particularly suitable for investors seeking immediate turnkey diversification. This approach facilitates exposure to a diverse range of strategies and/or specialised managers.
There is no fundamental difference between a feeder fund and a fund of funds, as the two terms are synonymous. Their strategy consists of investing mainly in a single master fund.
The choice depends on the profile of the end investor and his or her wealth objectives. The feeder fund is better suited to a specific objective aligned with a single fund as part of a customised portfolio construction, while the fund of funds is suitable for diversification in a single solution.
Not necessarily, but a fund of funds often involves an overlap of fees. A thorough analysis is essential to avoid excessive costs.
To conclude, feeder funds and funds of funds are now essential tools for financial advisers to access the world of unlisted companies. By mastering their specific characteristics and integrating them judiciously into a wealth allocation, the adviser is able to offer his clients a flexible diversification solution tailored to their expectations. A rigorous and informed approach remains the key to a successful strategy.